In the law of contracts, the mirror image rule, also referred to as an unequivocal and absolute acceptance requirement, states that an offer must be accepted exactly with no modifications. The offeror is the master of one's own offer. This common law rule has been modified by statute in some circumstances under modern practice.
Case | Application | Details |
---|---|---|
Adams v. Lindsell | Exact Acceptance | The acceptance was deemed valid as soon as it was sent by mail, fulfilling the mirror rule requirement. |
Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v. Ex-Cell-O Corporation | Modern Modification | The court allowed some flexibility under the UCC, recognizing the formation of a contract despite minor differences in terms. |
Livingstone v. Evans | Counteroffer | The court ruled that an acceptance with modifications constitutes a counteroffer, not a valid acceptance under the mirror rule. |
The mirror rule ensures clarity and certainty in contract formation by requiring that acceptance exactly match the offer. This prevents misunderstandings and disputes over contract terms. However, modern statutes like the UCC provide some flexibility to accommodate commercial practices, allowing contracts to form even when minor terms differ between the offer and acceptance.
For more detailed information, see our related Contracts terms: