Statement Against Interest

Learn about the definition for this legal term.

What is Statement Against Interest?

A statement made by a person which places them in a seriously less advantageous position than if they had not made the statement is considered credible and admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule.

Detailed Examples and Case Studies

A statement against interest is a statement made by a person that places them in a significantly less advantageous position—whether financially, legally, or otherwise—compared to if they had not made the statement. Such statements are deemed credible and are admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule, given that individuals are unlikely to make statements that are harmful to their own interests unless they believe them to be true. The following examples and case studies illustrate the application and implications of statements against interest in various legal contexts:

Legal Examples:

  • Example 1: Admission of Fault in a Car Accident
    In a deposition, a driver admits, "I was speeding and ran the red light which caused the accident." This statement against interest is admissible as evidence since it places the driver in a legally disadvantaged position by admitting fault in the accident.
  • Example 2: Confession of Embezzlement
    A corporate officer tells a colleague, "I diverted company funds into my personal account." This incriminating statement is against the officer's financial and legal interests, making it admissible in court, despite being hearsay.

Relevant Cases:

These cases further demonstrate the use and admissibility of statements against interest in legal proceedings:

  • Williamson v. United States: This case involved the admissibility of statements made by a drug courier implicating himself and others. The Supreme Court ruled that statements genuinely self-incriminating are admissible as statements against interest, but care must be taken to exclude portions of the statement that are not self-incriminating or are otherwise unreliable.
  • Chambers v. Mississippi: The Supreme Court held that excluding statements against interest can violate a defendant's right to a fair trial. In this case, multiple statements against interest were made by a third party confessing to the crime for which the defendant was accused, and the exclusion of these statements was deemed to undermine the defendant's case.

Real-World Impact:

  • Credibility and Reliability: Statements against interest are considered inherently credible because individuals are unlikely to voluntarily make statements that are contrary to their own interests unless they believe them to be true. This principle underpins their admissibility as an exception to the hearsay rule.
  • Legal Proceedings: Admitting statements against interest can significantly impact the outcome of legal proceedings by providing reliable evidence that might otherwise be excluded under the hearsay rule. Such statements can support claims, establish liability, or refute defenses.
  • Scope of Admissibility: The scope of admissibility for statements against interest is limited to those portions of the statement that are genuinely self-incriminating or against the declarant's interests. Courts carefully scrutinize these statements to ensure their reliability and relevance.
  • Protecting Rights: Courts must balance the admissibility of statements against interest with preserving the declarant's rights. Excluding relevant statements that are against interest can sometimes lead to unfair outcomes, as seen in Chambers v. Mississippi.
  • Criminal and Civil Cases: Statements against interest are used in both criminal and civil cases to provide evidence that might otherwise be unavailable. Whether an admission of liability in a civil matter or a confession in a criminal case, these statements play a critical role in the judicial process.
  • Legal Strategy: Attorneys must be adept at identifying, preserving, and presenting statements against interest. They must also be prepared to challenge the admissibility of such statements when they lack sufficient indicia of reliability or relevance to the matter at hand.
  • Jury Consideration: Juries are instructed on the significance of statements against interest and their inherent credibility. Jurors must consider how these statements fit into the broader context of the evidence presented and assess their weight accordingly.

Further Reading

For more detailed information, see our related Evidence terms:

Pass the Bar, Guaranteed

BarPrepHero Premium offers the most complete collection of real bar exam questions licensed directly from NCBE (the organization that writes the exam).
Bar Exam starts in:
Days
Hrs
Mins
Secs
Study better now