The tender years doctrine is a prominent common law principle in family law and custody jurisprudence. It presumes that during a child's "tender" years (generally regarded as the age of four and under), the mother has the superior skills to care for the child and she should have custody of the child. The doctrine is becoming discredited in custody disputes due to the predominant view of sexual and gender equality.
Case | Application | Details |
---|---|---|
Smith v. Smith | Historical Application | The court applied the tender years doctrine, granting custody of a three-year-old child to the mother. |
Johnson v. Johnson | Transition Period | During the 1980s, courts began considering the father's role more seriously, leading to more balanced custody decisions. |
Doe v. Roe | Modern Shifts | The court emphasized gender equality, awarding joint custody based on the best interests of the child. |
The tender years doctrine played a significant role in shaping early custody decisions by presuming mothers as the primary caregivers for young children. However, its relevance has declined due to evolving views on gender equality and parenting roles. Modern family law focuses on the best interests of the child, considering factors such as each parent's ability to provide care, the child's emotional needs, and the child's relationship with each parent. This shift promotes more balanced and fair custody arrangements, reflecting contemporary understandings of parental roles and responsibilities.
For more detailed information, see our related Family Law terms: